Nick (A5 pencil on sketchbook page 2014-15)
In his new book on British portraiture Simon Schama cites some research undertaken at Princeton University that demonstrates
a reading of one 10th of a second is enough for us to decide whether we trust or mistrust a face, whether we want to engage or disengage from a countenance: a mere Tinder-swipe to settle our allegiance into a resolution no mere speech is likely to alter. It is this elementary social wiring that makes portraiture the most basic of all the genres of the visual arts.
He goes on to say: “A portrait must offer a good likeness, so the truism holds. But this raises an enormous question: a likeness of what exactly?…The greatest of all portraitists – a Rembrandt or a Goya – caught their subjects as if temporarily halted between a before and an after; an interruption of the flux of life rather than a becalmed pose.”
In her wonderful book, Drawing and Painting People, which I can’t recommend highly enough for anyone wanting a fresh approach to drawing their own kind, Emily Ball asks:
Should the final piece look like the person in a way that is photographically accurate for it to be a valid likeness? No. Should it be like the person? Yes, although a likeness can be visible in many subtle ways.
The title of this post does not imply any question about the parentage of my dear son, Nick: a comparison of our feet will demonstrate that we share the same gene pool. No, I’m misquoting Michael Jackson to say that I’ve not quite hit the target. Having seen this drawing, you might be able to pick him out of a group of twentysomethings in a crowded room; it also catches something of his humour and his warmth. It doesn’t, I don’t think, quite capture what Emily Ball calls ‘the gaze’: it isn’t quite Nick.
It won’t stop me from trying and trying again until, I hope, one day to have a picture of Nick – or of my daughter, partner, whomever – that actually nails that elusive Something that makes them what they really are.
This is the first of two posts on portraits this week: I have volunteered to join Teresa Robeson’s #Portrait challenge on the 25th.
I think this looks terrific, Michael, and thank you for that book reference! I’m planning to join in for Teresa’s challenge too.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Many thanks, Laura.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Very interesting, has got me thinking, and I will look up the book on Amazon, I have attempted to draw my daughter, and your comments are also true to my own piece,I must try again. Thank you, and I love your drawing.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Many thanks for your kind comment. The Emily Ball book is great, if a little unconventional.
LikeLiked by 1 person
You have certainly captured feeling in your sons eyes, Michael. Beautifully rendered. Thanks for the mention of reference materials and Teresa’s 25th date for portraits. I may join in. But my post will be on the 28. 😄 Have a happy day.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Sharon, I will wait about week to compile all the links, so no worries! 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Many thanks, Sharon. Looking forward to seeing yours on the 28th.
LikeLike
Yay, yay, yay! I’m so glad you’re joining the challenge! (Speaking of which, I meant to add another reminder in my blog post today but completely forgot.) I think this is an awesome portrait…the simple lines of the contours and shadows convey so much they really belie the simplicity! I can’t wait to see your portrait!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Many thanks, Teresa, much appreciated! For the challenge I assume we put #Portraitchallenge in the title or the tag or something, right?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Oh, that’s a great idea! I’ve not thought about that…Kirk and I kind of decided on the spot that we’d try this. 🙂 So, being an impromptu thing, I’d not thought of everything. I think it’ll get more organized as time goes on. LOL!
LikeLiked by 1 person
What a fascinating blog. Thank you
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks, Rosie.
LikeLiked by 1 person